Type af revisorbistand:Revisionspåtegning
Navn på revisionsvirksomhed:Grant Thornton Certified Public Accountants
Revisionsvirksomhedens CVR-nr.:34209936
Beskrivelse af revisor:State Authorised Public Accountant
Virksomhedens regnskabsklasse:Regnskabsklasse C, mellemstor virksomhed
Grundlag for konklusion (revision):Basis for OpinionWe conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) and theadditional requirements applicable in Denmark. Our responsibilities under those standards andrequirements are further described in the “Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the FinancialStatements” section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with theInternational Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for ProfessionalAccountants (IESBA Code) and the additional ethical requirements applicable in Denmark, and we havefulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the IESBA Code. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis forour opinion.
Konklusion (revision):OpinionWe have audited the financial statements of Peakon ApS for the financial year 1 February 2023 - 31January 2024, which comprise a summary of significant accounting policies, income statement, balancesheet and notes, for the Company. The financial statements are prepared under the Danish FinancialStatements Act. In our opinion, the financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Companyat 31 January 2024, and of the results of the Company's operations for the financial year 1 February 2023- 31 January 2024 in accordance with the Danish Financial Statements Act.
Udtalelse om ledelsesberetningen (revision):Statement on Management’s ReviewManagement is responsible for Management’s Review. Our opinion on the financial statements døs not cover Management’s Review, and we do not expressany form of assurance conclusion thereon. In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read Management’sReview and, in doing so, consider whether Management’s Review is materially inconsistent with thefinancial statements or our knowledge obtained during the audit, or otherwise appears to be materiallymisstated. Moreover, it is our responsibility to consider whether Management’s Review provides the informationrequired under the Danish Financial Statements Act. Based on the work we have performed, we conclude that Management’s Review is in accordance withthe financial statements and has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the DanishFinancial Statement Act. We did not identify any material misstatement of Management’s Review.