Type af revisorbistand:Revisionspåtegning
Navn på revisionsvirksomhed:Sønderup I/S
Revisionsvirksomhedens CVR-nr.:31824559
Virksomhedens regnskabsklasse:Regnskabsklasse B
Grundlag for konklusion (revision):
Basis of adverse opinion
The financial statements of the Company are presented on the assumption that the Company is a going concern. As mentioned in Note 1, the Company's ability to continue as a going concern depends on the Company achieving additional agreements to generate liquidity as the debt falls due. However, we have not received sufficient documentation to support this. Consequently, we give a qualified opinion as to presenting the financial statements of the Company on the assumption that the Company is a going concern.
Note 2 to the financial statements of the Company refers to the uncertainty connected with recognising and measuring the Companies development projects, recognised at DKK 10. 333 thousand. The value of the development projects directly depends on the Company achieving additional agreements to generate liquidity. Otherwise, the recoverable amount will be significantly lower than the carrying amount.
As mentioned above, we have not received sufficient documentation that the Company will achieve additional agreements to generate liquidity as the debt falls due which will significantly affect the value of the individual types of assets as specified above:
* We believe that the development projects will be negatively affected by an amount between DKK 0-10 million. The total impact on the Companies assets is then DKK 0-10 million, which, equivalently, will negatively affect the results for the year before tax and equity.
Consequently, we give a qualified opinion as to the measurement of the assets mentioned above.
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) and additional requirements applicable in Denmark. Our responsibility under those standards and requirements are further described in the “Auditors' responsibility for the Audit of the Financial Statements” section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants' International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) (IESBA Code) together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statement in Denmark, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the IESBA Code. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
, Basis of adverse opinion
The financial statements of the Company are presented on the assumption that the Company is a going concern. As mentioned in Note 1, the Company's ability to continue as a going concern depends on the Company achieving additional agreements to generate liquidity as the debt falls due. However, we have not received sufficient documentation to support this. Consequently, we give a qualified opinion as to presenting the financial statements of the Company on the assumption that the Company is a going concern.
Note 2 to the financial statements of the Company refers to the uncertainty connected with recognising and measuring the Companies development projects, recognised at DKK 10. 333 thousand. The value of the development projects directly depends on the Company achieving additional agreements to generate liquidity. Otherwise, the recoverable amount will be significantly lower than the carrying amount.
As mentioned above, we have not received sufficient documentation that the Company will achieve additional agreements to generate liquidity as the debt falls due which will significantly affect the value of the individual types of assets as specified above:
* We believe that the development projects will be negatively affected by an amount between DKK 0-10 million. The total impact on the Companies assets is then DKK 0-10 million, which, equivalently, will negatively affect the results for the year before tax and equity.
Consequently, we give a qualified opinion as to the measurement of the assets mentioned above.
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) and additional requirements applicable in Denmark. Our responsibility under those standards and requirements are further described in the “Auditors' responsibility for the Audit of the Financial Statements” section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants' International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) (IESBA Code) together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statement in Denmark, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the IESBA Code. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Konklusion (revision):Adverse opinion
We have audited the financial statements of MyD2App ApS for the financial year 1 January 2022 - 31 December 2022, which comprise a summary of significant accounting policies, income statement, balance sheet, statement of changes in equity and notes. The financial statements are prepared in accordance with the Danish Financial Statements Act.
In our opinion, due to the significance of the matter described in the "Basis-of-adverse-opinion" paragraph, the Financial Statements do not give a true and fair view of Company's financial position at 31 December 2022 and of the results of its operationsfor the financial year 1 January 2022 - 31 December 2022 in accordance with the Danish Financial Statements Act.
Udtalelse om ledelsesberetningen (revision):Management is responsible for the Management's review.
Our opinion on the financial statements døs not cover the Management's review, and we do not express any form of opinion providing assurance regarding the Management's review.
Our responsibility in connection with our audit of the financial statements is to read the Management's review and, in doing so, consider whether the Management's review is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or with the knowledge we have gained during the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
Moreover, it is our responsibility to consider whether the Management's review meets the disclosure requirements in the Danish Financial Statements Act.
Based on our procedures, we are of the opinion that the Management's review is in accordance with the financial statements and has been prepared in accordance with the requirements in the Danish Financial Statements Act. In our opinion, the Management's review is not materially misstated. , Statement on Management's Review
Management is responsible for the Management's review.
Our opinion on the financial statements døs not cover the Management's review, and we do not express any form of opinion providing assurance regarding the Management's review.
Our responsibility in connection with our audit of the financial statements is to read the Management's review and, in doing so, consider whether the Management's review is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or with the knowledge we have gained during the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
Moreover, it is our responsibility to consider whether the Management's review meets the disclosure requirements in the Danish Financial Statements Act.
Based on our procedures, we are of the opinion that the Management's review is in accordance with the financial statements and has been prepared in accordance with the requirements in the Danish Financial Statements Act. In our opinion, the Management's review is not materially misstated.