Type af revisorbistand:Revisionspåtegning
Navn på revisionsvirksomhed:EY Godkendt revisionspartnerselskab
Revisionsvirksomhedens CVR-nr.:30700228
Beskrivelse af revisor:Statsautoriseret revisor
Virksomhedens regnskabsklasse:Regnskabsklasse C, stor virksomhed
Grundlag for konklusion (revision):Basis for OpinionWe conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) and additional require-ments applicable in Denmark. Our responsibilities under those standards and requirements are further described in the ”Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements” section of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. IndependenceWe are independent of the Company in accordance with the International Ethics Standards Board for Ac-countants’ International Code of Ethics for Professio-nal Accountants (IESBA Code) and the additional ethical requirements applicable in Denmark, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the IESBA Code. Management’s Responsibilities for the Financial StatementsManagement is responsible for the preparation of financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with the Danish Financial Statements Act and for such internal control as Management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the financial statements, Management is responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to con-tinue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the financial statements unless Management either i ntends to liquidate the Company or to cease opera-tions, or has no realistic alternative but to do so. Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial StatementsOur objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance as to whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs and additional requirements applicable in Denmark will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggre-gate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements. As part of an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs and additional requirements applicable in Denmark, we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also• Identify and assess the risks of material misstate-ment of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations or the override of internal control. • Obtain an understanding of internal control rele-vant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effec-tiveness of the Company’s internal control. • Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of ac-counting estimates and related disclosures made by Management. • Conclude on the appropriateness of Manage-ment’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the financial statements and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such dis-closures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern. • Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and contents of the financial statements, including the note disclosures, and whether the financial state-ments represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that gives a true and fair view. We communicate with those charged with govern ance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
Konklusion (revision):OpinionWe have audited the financial statements of Antalis A/S for the financial year 1 January – 31 December 2022, which comprise income statement, balance sheet, statement of changes in equity and notes, including accounting policies. The financial state-ments are prepared in accordance with the Danish Financial Statements Act. In our opinion, the financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Company at 31 December 2022 and of the results of the Company’s operations for the financial year 1 January – 31 December 2022 in accordance with the Danish Financial Statements Act.
Udtalelse om ledelsesberetningen (revision):Statement on the Management’s reviewManagement is responsible for the Management’s review. Our opinion on the financial statements døs not cover the Management’s review, and we do not ex-press any form of assurance conclusion thereon. In connection with our audit of the financial state-ments, our responsibility is to read the Manage-ment’s review and, in doing so, consider whether the Management’s review is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge ob-tained during the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. Moreover, it is our responsibility to consider whether the Management’s review provides the information required under the Danish Financial Statements Act. Based on the work we have performed, we conclude that the Management’s review is in accordance with the financial statements and has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Danish Financial Statement Act. We did not identify any material misstatement of the Management’s review.
LoginOpret gratis brugere-conomic integration